Plant Hybridization as an Alternative Technique in Plant Breeding Improvement

Main Article Content

Immaculate Mueni Mwangangi
Joshua Kiilu Muli
Johnstone Omukhulu Neondo


For ages, plant breeders have relied on the genetic variability that results from sexually crossing plants within the same species. However, the variability that exists within species populations is inadequate, hence the need to exploit desirable traits of interest in distantly related or even unrelated plants through hybridization techniques. Hybridization can be categorized into two; sexual and somatic. Sexual hybridization, also referred to as wide or distant hybridization involves combining two genomes from different parental taxa through pollination, either naturally or by induction. Somatic hybridization involves the fusion of somatic cells instead of gametes, which highly depends on the ability to obtain viable protoplasts and eventually differentiate them to whole plants in vitro. The impacts of hybrids can either be positive or negative. Among the positive attributes of hybrids that have been exploited is heterosis, which results either from dominance, over-dominance or epistasis. Negative ones include sterility, arrested growth of the pollen tube and embryo abortion. To overcome these problems, chromosome doubling, the use of hormones such as 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) and embryo rescue have been employed to overcome sterility, arrested growth of pollen tubes and embryo abortion respectively. After the development of hybrids, different hybrid identification techniques have been used to test them such as the use of molecular and morphological markers, cytogenetic analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization. The use of hybridization techniques in plant improvement remains a vital tool to cross species barriers and utilization of important attributes in unrelated crop plants which could not have been achieved through conventional techniques of plant breeding.

Hybridization, reproductive barriers, molecular markers

Article Details

How to Cite
Mwangangi, I., Kiilu Muli, J., & Neondo, J. (2019). Plant Hybridization as an Alternative Technique in Plant Breeding Improvement. Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science, 4(1), 1-11.
Review Article

Article Metrics


Govindaraj M, Vetriventhan M, Srinivasan M. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International. 2015;1-14.
DOI: 10.1155/2015/431487.

Fu YB. Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2015; 128(11):2131-2142.

Migicovsky Z, Myles S. Exploiting Wild Relatives for genomics-assisted breeding of perennial crops. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8(460).

Limera C, Sabbadini S, Sweet JB, Mezzetti B. New biotechnological tools for the genetic improvement of major woody fruit species. Front Plant Sci. 2017;(8):1418.

Waara S, Glimelius K. The potential of somatic hybridization in crop breeding. Euphytica. 1995;85(1-3):217-233.

Glimelius K. Sexual and somatic hybridization. Hereditas Suppl. 1985;3: 41-47.

Hodnett GL, Hale AL, Packer DJ, Stelly DM, Silva J, Rooney WL. Elimination of a reproductive barrier facilitates intergeneric hybridization of Sorghum bicolor and saccharum. Crop Sci. 2010;50(4):1188–1195.

Gaskin JF, Wheeler GS, Purcell MF, Taylor GS. Molecular evidence of hybridization in Florida’s sheoak (Casuarina spp.) invasion. Mol Ecol. 2009; 18(15):3216–3226.

Goulet BE, Roda F, Hopkins R. Hybridization in plants: Old ideas, new techniques. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(1): 65–78.

Liu J, Xu X, Deng X. Intergeneric somatic hybridization and its application to crop genetic improvement. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2005;82(1):19–44.

Maclntyre R, Campbell M. Triticale. Proceedings of an international symposium [Internet]. Mexico: International Development Research Centre. 1973;13-14.
[Cited 14 March 2019]
Available: https://idl-bnc-

Liu D, Zhang H, Zhang L, Yuan Z, Hao M, Zheng Y. Distant Hybridization: A tool for interspecific manipulation of chromosomes. In: Alien Gene Transfer in Crop Plants. New York, NY: Springer. 2014;25–42.

Grosser JW, Gmitter FG. Protoplast fusion for production of tetraploids and triploids: Applications for scion and rootstock breeding in citrus. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Cult. 2011;104(3):343-357.
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9823-4

Carlson PS, Smith HH, Dearing RD. Parasexual interspecific plant hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1972; 69(8):2292–2294.

Terada R, Kyozuka J, Nishibayashi S, Shimamoto K. Plantlet regeneration from somatic hybrids of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing). Mol Gen Genet. 1987;210(1):39–43.

Abomohra AE-F, El-Sheekh M, Hanelt D. Protoplast fusion and genetic recombination between Ochromonas danica (Chrysophyta) and Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyta). Phycologia. 2016; 55(1).

Durieu P, Ochatt SJ. Efficient intergeneric fusion of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) protoplasts. J Exp Bot. 2000;51(348):1237–1242.
DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/51.348.1237.

Mishra D, Vishnupriya MR, Anil MG, Konda K, Sonti R V. Pathotype and Genetic Diversity amongst Indian Isolates of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):1–11.

Guo WW, Xiao SX, Deng XX. Somatic cybrid production via protoplast fusion for citrus improvement. Scientia Horticulturae. 2013;163:20-26.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081996.

Polzerová H, Patzak J, Greplová M. Early characterization of somatic hybrids from symmetric protoplast electrofusion of Solanum pinnatisectum Dun. and Solanum tuberosum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011;104(2):163-170.
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9813-6

Tapingkae T, Zulkarnain Z, Kawaguchi M, Ikeda T, Taji A. Somatic (asexual) procedures (haploids, protoplasts, cell selection) and their applications. In: Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture. 2012;141-162.

Fatta Del Bosco S, Napoli E, Mercati F, Abbate L, Carimi F, Ruberto G. Somatic cybridization for citrus: Polyphenols distribution in juices and peel essential oil composition of a diploid cybrid from Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus reshni Hort. ex Tan.) and sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2017;64(2):261-275.
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-015-0348-x

Zhang F, Wang P, Ji D, Kang G, Xiang F. Asymmetric somatic hybridization between Bupleurum scorzonerifolium Wild. and Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(10):1857-1864.
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1093-z

Binsfeld PC, Wingender R, Schnabl H. Characterization and molecular analysis of transgenic plants obtained by microprotoplast fusion in sunflower. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101(8):1250-1258.

Varotto S, Nenz E, Lucchin M, Parrini P. Production of asymmetric somatic hybrid plants between Cichorium intybus L. and Helianthus annuus L. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102(6):950-956.

Kochevenko A, Ratushnyak Y, Kornyeyev D, Stasik O, Porublyova L, Kochubey S, Suprunova T, Gleba Y. Functional cybrid plants of Lycopersicon peruvianum var ‘dentatum’ with chloroplasts of Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Cell Rep. 2000;19(6):588- 597.

Maliga P, Lörz H, Lázár G, Nagy F. Cytoplast-protoplast fusion for interspecific chloroplast transfer in Nicotiana. Mol Gen Genet. 1982;185(2):211–215.

Bracha M, Sher N. Fusion of enucleated protoplasts with nucleated miniprotoplasts in onion (Allium cepa L.). Plant Sci Lett. 1981;23(1):95-101.

Lörz H, Paszkowski J, Dierks‐Ventling C, Potrykus I. Isolation and characterization of cytoplasts and miniprotoplasts derived from protoplasts of cultured cells. Physiol Plant. 1981;53(3):385–391.

Omar AA, Murata M, Yu Q, Gmitter FG, Chase CD, Graham JH, et al. Production of three new grapefruit cybrids with potential for improved citrus canker resistance. Vitr Cell Dev Biol - Plant. 2017;53(3):256–269.
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-017-9816-7

Sigareva MA, Earle ED. Direct transfer of a cold-tolerant Ogura male-sterile cytoplasm into cabbage (Brassica oleracea ssp. capitata) via protoplast fusion. Theor Appl Genet. 1997; 94(2):213-220.

Fitter JT, Thomas MR, Niu C, Rose RJ. Investigation of Nicotiana tabacum (+) N. suaveolens cybrids with carpelloid stamens. J Plant Physiol. 2005;162(2): 225–235.
DOI: org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.02.006

Belete T. A review on somatic hybridization and its utilization in crop improvement. Int J African Asian Stud. 2018;43:24–34.

Grosser JW, Gmitter FG. Protoplast fusion and citrus improvement. Plant Breed. Rev. 1990;8:339–374.
DOI: 10.1002/9781118061053.ch10.

Shimonaka M, Hosoki T, Tomita M, Yasumuro Y. Production of Somatic Hybrid Plants between Japanese Bunching Onion (Allium fistulosum L.). and Bulb Onion (A. cepa L.) via electrofusion. Japan Soc Hort Sci. 2002;71(5):623-631.
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.71.623

Dragoeva A, Atanassov I, Atanassov A. CMS due to tapetal failure in cybrids between Nicotiana tabacum and Petunia hybrida. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998; 55(1):67-70.

Conner AJ, Tynan JL. A maternally inherited, chlorophyll-deficient mutant of a transgenic kanamycin-resistant Nicotiana plumbaginifolia plant. Int J Plant Sci. 1995; 156(3):320-325.

Tsien RY. The green fluorescent protein. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:509-544.
DOI: 10.1086/297253

Olivares-fuster O, Pena L, Duran-Vila N, Navarro L. Green Fluorescent Protein as a Visual Marker in Somatic Hybridization. Ann Bot. 2002;89:491–497.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf054

Guo W, Grosser JW. Somatic hybrid vigor in Citrus : Direct evidence from protoplast fusion of an embryogenic callus line with a transgenic mesophyll parent expressing the GFP gene. Plant science. 2005;168: 1541–1545.
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.029

Zeliang PK, Pattanayak A. Wide Hybridization in the genus Oryza : Aspects and prospects. Indian J Hill Farming. 2013;26(2):71–77.

Debbarama C. Wide Hybridization and embryo-rescue for crop improvement in capsicum. Agrotechnology. 2013;01(S11). DOI: 10.4172/2168-9881.S11-003

Chen J, Luo M, Li S, Tao M, Ye X, Duan W, Zhang C, Qin Q, Xiao J, Liu S. A comparative study of distant hybridization in plants and animals. Science China Life Sciences. 2018;61(3):285-309.
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9094-2

Zelaya IA, Owen MD, Vangessel MJ. Transfer of glyphosate resistance: evidence of hybridization in Conyza (Asteraceae). Am J Bot. 2007;94(4):660–673.
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.4.660

Yang L, Li B, Zheng XY, Li J, Yang M, Dong X, He G, An C, Deng XW. Salicylic acid biosynthesis is enhanced and contributes to increased biotrophic pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis hybrids. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–11.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8309

Birchler JA. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell Online [Internet]. 2003;15(10):2236–2239.
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.151030

Edmands S, Feaman HV, Harrison JS, Timmerman CC. Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations. J Hered. 2005;96(2):114–123.
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi014

Murayama S, Abu M, Sarker Z. Agronomic Performance of F 1 Hybrids of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Japonica-indica crosses. Plant Prod Sci. 2015;1008.
DOI: 10.1626/pps.5.203

Owuoche JO, Sears RG, Brown-Guedira GL, Gill BS, Fritz AK. Heterotic effects of wheat- rye chromosomal translocations on agronomic traits of hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under an adequate moisture regime. Euphytica. 2003;132(1): 67–77.

Pesqueira J, García MD, Molina MC. NaCl tolerance in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) x Tripsacum dactyloides L. hybrid calli and regenerated plants. Spanish J Agric Res. 2003;1(2):59–63.

Shavrukov Y, Sokolov V. Maize-gamagrass interspecific hybrid, Zea mays x Tripsacum dactyloides, shows better salinity tolerance and higher NA + exclusion than maize and sorghum. Electronic Journal of Biotech. 2015;4 (1):128-133.
DOI: 10.2225/vol9-issue3- fulltext-25

Bushell C, Spielman M, Scott RJ. The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1430–1442. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010496

Koide Y, Ogino A, Yoshikawa T, Kitashima Y, Saito N, Kanaoka Y, Onishi K, Yoshitake Y, Tsukiyama T, Saito H, Teraishi M, Yamagata Y, Uemura A, Takagi H, Hayashi Y, Abe T, Fukuta Y, Okumoto Y, Kanazawa A. Lineage-specific gene acquisition or loss is involved in interspecific hybrid sterility in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(9):1955-1962. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711656115

Kubo T. Genetic mechanisms of postzygotic reproductive isolation: An epistatic network in rice. Breed Sci. 2013; 63(4):359–366.
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.63.359

Scopece G, Widmer A, Cozzolino S. Evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in a guild of deceptive orchids. Am Nat. 2008;171(3):315-326.

Johnson N. Hybrid incompatibility and speciation. Nature Education. 2008; 1(1):20.

Edmands S. Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2002;17(11): 520-527.
DOI: 10.1086/527501

Levin DA. The long wait for hybrid sterility in flowering plants. New Phytol. 2012; 196(3):666–670.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04309.x

Sweigart AL, Fishman L, Willis JH. A simple genetic incompatibility causes hybrid male sterility in mimulus. Genetics. 2006;172(4):2465–2479.
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.053686

Wang H, Bennetzen JL. Centromere retention and loss during the descent of maize from a tetraploid ancestor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(51):21004–21009.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218668109

Nair NV. Production and cyto-morphological analysis of intergeneric hybrids of Sorghum x Saccharum. Euphytica. 1999;108(3):187-191.
DOI: 10.1023/A:1003633015836

Riera Lizarazu O, Rines HW, Phillips RL. Cytological and molecular characterization of oatxmaize partial hybrids. Theor appl Genet.1996;93(1/2):123–135.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00225737

Molina MDC, García MD, Chorzempa SE. Meiotic study of Zea mays ssp. mays (2n = 40) x Tripsacum dactyloides (2n = 72) hybrid and its progeny. Electron J Biotechnol. 2006;9(3):276–280.

Hadzhiivanova B, Bozhanova V, Dechev D. Interspecific hybridization between durum wheat and Aegilops umbellulata (Zhuk.). Bulg J Agric Sci. 2012;18(5):713–921.

Melchinger AE, Molenaar WS, Mirdita V, Schipprack W. Colchicine alternatives for chromosome doubling in maize haploids for doubled- haploid production. Crop Sci. 2016;56(2):1-41.
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0383

Rose JB, Kubba J, Tobutt KR. Chromosome doubling in sterile Syringa vulgaris × S. pinnatifolia hybrids by in vitro culture of nodal explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2000;6(2):127–132.

Stelkens RB, Schmid C, Seehausen O. Hybrid breakdown in cichlid fish. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127207.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127207

Kubo T, Yoshimura A. Genetic basis of hybrid breakdown in a Japonica/Indica cross of rice, Oryza sativa L. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105(6–7):906–911.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127207

Oka A, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Takagi N, Takano-Shimizu T, Toshimori K, Moriwaki K, Shiroishi T. Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics. 2004;166(2):913-924.

Li Z, Pinson SRM, Paterson AH, Park WD, Stansel JW. Genetics of hybrid sterility and hybrid breakdown in an intersubspecific rice (Oryza sativa L.) population. Genetics. 1997;145(4):1139–1148.

Dickinson GR, Lee DJ, Wallace HM. The influence of pre- and post-zygotic barriers on interspecific Corymbia hybridization. Ann Bot. 2012;109(7):1215–1226.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs050

Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D. The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytol. 2015; 207(4):968–984.
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13424

Heslop-Harrison Y, Reger BJ, Hesslop-Harrison J. Wide hybridization: Pollination of Zea mays L. by Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Theor Appl Genet. 1985;70:252–258.
DOI: 10.1007/BF00304908

Wędzony M, Lammeren A. Van. Pollen tube growth and early embryogenesis in wheat× maize crosses influenced by 2, 4-D. Ann Bot. 1996;(1991):639–647.
DOI: 10.1093/aob/77.6.639

Anamthawat-Jonsson K. Wide-hybrids between wheat and lymegrass: Breeding and agricultural potential. Buvusindi. 1996; 10:101–113.

JinFeng C, Adelberg J. Interspecific hybridization in cucumis - progress, problems, and perspectives. HortScience. 2000;35(1):11–5.

Liu H, Yan G, Sedgley R. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Leucadendron through embryo rescue. South African J Bot. 2006;72(3):416–20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2005.11.003

Pannanee Rodrangboon, Pradit Pongtongkam, SS, TA. Abnormal embryo development and efficient embryo rescue in interspecific hybrids, Oryza sativa × O. minuta and O. sativa × O. officinalis. Breed Sci. 2002;52:123–9.

Moller AP. Developmental stability of flowers, embryo abortion, and developmental selection in plants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1996;263:53-56.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0009

Kuhlman LC, Burson BL, Klein PE, Klein RR, Stelly DM, Price HJ, Rooney WL. Genetic recombination in Sorghum bicolor x S. macrospermum interspecific hybrids. Genome. 2008;51(9):749–56.
DOI: 10.1139/G08-061

Hegde SG, Waines JG. Hybridization and introgression between bread wheat and wild and weedy relatives in North America. Crop Sci. 2004;44:1145–55.
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.1145

Reed SM, Jones DK, Rinehart TA. Production and characterization of intergeneric hybrids between Dichroa febrifuga and Hydrangea macrophylla. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;133(1):84-91.
DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.133.1.84

Fatokun CA. Wide hybridization in cowpea: Problems and prospects. Euphytica. 1991; 54(2):137–40.

Deng Y, Chen S, Chen F, Cheng X, Zhang F. The embryo rescue derived intergeneric hybrid between chrysanthemum and Ajania przewalskii shows enhanced cold tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(12): 2177-2186.
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1123-x

Roy PS, Dash AK, Subudhi HN, Rao RN, Rao JN. Molecular and morphological characterization of Indian rice hybrids. Aust J Crop Sci. 2014;8(12):1607–1614.

Lopez-Caamal A, Tovar-Sánchez E. Genetic, morphological, and chemical patterns of plant hybridization. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2014;87(1):1–15.

Pooler MR, Riedel LGH, Bentz SE, Townsend AM. Molecular markers used to verify interspecific hybridization between Hemlock (Tsuga) species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2002;127(4):623–7.

Ballester J, De Vicente MC. Determination of F1 hybrid seed purity in pepper using PCR- based markers. Euphytica. 1998; 103(2):223–226.

Turchetto C, Segatto ALA, Beduschi J, Bonatto SL, Freitas LB. Genetic differentiation and hybrid identification using microsatellite markers in closely related wild species. AoB Plants. 2015;7: plv084.

Kirk H, Young HC, Hye KK, Verpoorte R, Van Der Meijden E. Comparing metabolomes: The chemical consequences of hybridization in plants. New Phytol. 2005;167(2):613–22.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01448.x

Orians CM. The effects of hybridization in plants on secondary chemistry: Implications for the ecology and evolution of plant - Herbivore interactions. Am J Bot. 2000;87(12):1749–56.